Today I realized something. Most of the arguments end up in
a terrible fight. Most of the people don’t know how to argue and pretend to do
so.
Heinrichs points put a very interesting point. He states
that if one argues to win then the argument will end up in an argument. He
states that “the purpose of the
argument is to persuasive, not correct” (156).
He also talks about illogic thinking. To convince your
opponent one has to try all the tips he has showed us. However one has to know
when to use them. Some of the time when you identify fallacies one can end in a
fight. Rather than identifying them one has to show the ways to trick your
opponent and come up with an intelligent come back.
In this video, Candace (the girl) just tries to offend
Phineas. Candace goal while saying “sucked into a videogame” was to offend him. Phineas decided to ignore that part of the offense and just take it
as a brilliant idea for the day. They would get sucked into a videogame!
Sometimes you just have to let things pass. Like Phineas, he
just ignored her sister and continued his day. He used his sister “offense” to
create a plan that will make his day more interesting and fun. This is what
Heinrichs calls the inarguable. This comment was just random, however if he had
start to argue then it would of turned into a illogical fight.
In this chapter Heinrichs clearly states: “in most cases
there is no right or wrong decision in an argument” (157). In other words one
has to go with the flow, not stressing about what is right of wrong. My mother
always tells me en la guerra y en el amor
todo se vale. Arguments are more like a war of words; the one that
convinces better using rhetorical tricks wins.
¨All is fair in love and war¨ is the saying in English.
ReplyDelete